A 2G tracker is the cheapest unit on the quote and the most expensive one to own, because the network underneath it is being switched off market by market while the asset is still in service.
Buy 4G. A 2G tracker costs less up front but depends on a network that operators are progressively shutting down, and a tracker that outlives its network has to be replaced and re-installed at full labour cost. The purchase price difference is small; the replacement cost is not.
| Technology | Status | Best for | Consideration |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2G / GPRS | Being retired market by market | Nothing new in 2026 | Cheapest unit, shortest usable life |
| 3G | Already retired in many markets | Nothing new | Often retired before 2G, not after |
| 4G / LTE Cat-1 | Current mainstream | Most vehicle tracking | The default sensible choice |
| LTE-M (Cat-M1) | Growing | Battery-powered assets, long life | Coverage varies by operator |
| NB-IoT | Growing | Static or slow-moving assets | Poor at handover — weak for moving vehicles |
| Satellite | Niche | Desert, marine, out of cellular range | Expensive per message; hybrid units exist |
The arithmetic that makes 2G look attractive is straightforward and wrong. The unit is cheaper, sometimes by a meaningful margin across a few hundred vehicles, and the saving is visible immediately on the quote. What is not on the quote is the replacement.
When a network is retired, every device on it stops reporting on the same day. Replacing them is not just the new hardware — it is a technician per vehicle, vehicles off the road, re-installation, re-calibration of any fuel probe, and re-commissioning on the platform. That total is several times the original saving, and it arrives unplanned.
Networks are retired on national schedules set by operators and regulators, not globally. Several markets have already completed 2G shutdown; others have retired 3G first and kept 2G running for legacy machine-to-machine traffic; others have announced dates and moved them. Any blanket statement about when 2G ends is wrong somewhere.
The practical step is to check the published position of the operators in every country you deploy in — not only the one you are standing in. A GCC reseller selling into several markets can easily find that hardware which is fine in one country is unsupported in the next.
Both are low-power cellular technologies aimed at devices that must run for years on a battery, and both are genuinely useful — for the right asset. The distinction that matters is mobility.
LTE-M handles movement between cells reasonably and suits battery-powered trackers on trailers, containers and plant that move but report infrequently. NB-IoT is designed for stationary devices such as meters, and handles cell handover poorly — putting it on a moving vehicle produces exactly the gaps you would expect. Coverage for both also varies considerably by operator, so confirm locally rather than assuming.
For vehicles: 4G LTE Cat-1, with 2G fallback if the unit offers it and your markets still carry 2G. For battery-powered assets that move: LTE-M. For assets that do not move: NB-IoT is reasonable. For anything operating beyond cellular coverage — desert routes, marine, remote sites — look at hybrid cellular-satellite units and budget for per-message satellite costs.
Our device guides note which series cover which networks; Teltonika, for example, splits its range by network technology rather than by protocol, so the same protocol runs across FMB, FMC and FMM units.
Tell us which countries you deploy in and we will tell you what to specify. Ask about hardware or message us on WhatsApp — we sell no hardware and take no margin on it, so the advice costs you nothing either way.
No, not for any new deployment. The unit price saving is real but small, and it is dwarfed by the cost of replacing and re-installing the entire fleet when the network is retired — technician time, vehicle downtime, re-calibration and re-commissioning. Specify 4G.
There is no single answer, because retirement is scheduled nationally by operators and regulators. Some markets have already completed it, others have retired 3G first and kept 2G for legacy machine-to-machine traffic, and announced dates have moved before. Check the published position of operators in every country you deploy in.
Generally no. NB-IoT is designed for stationary devices such as utility meters and handles movement between cells poorly, which produces reporting gaps on a moving vehicle. LTE-M is the low-power option that tolerates mobility; for normal vehicle tracking, 4G LTE Cat-1 remains the sensible default.
Hybrid cellular-satellite units exist and work, with the tracker using cellular where available and falling back to satellite elsewhere. Budget for satellite messaging costs, which are charged per message and are considerably higher than cellular data — and set reporting intervals accordingly rather than leaving the vehicle default.
No. Network and protocol are independent — a Teltonika FMB on 4G and an FMM on LTE-M both speak Codec 8 and report into the same platform identically. Choose the network for the asset and the coverage, and the protocol takes care of itself.
Describe the problem rather than the product. We will tell you what solves it, including when that is the cheaper option.
Talk to an Engineer →