Definitions and comparisons for the decisions that get made before a platform is ever chosen — hardware, networks, and what the words in your quote actually mean.
Five references covering the decisions that come before the software choice.
The commercial pages these guides lead into.
| If you are deciding… | Go to |
|---|---|
| Which tracker hardware to buy | The device integration guides |
| Whether a capability will actually work for you | The platform feature guides |
| Whether to build or buy a platform | White-label vs custom GPS platform |
| How to size and host a platform | GPS tracking server hosting |
| Whether to resell under your own brand | The partner programme |
Every page here has to be useful to somebody who ends up buying from a competitor. That sounds like a strange standard for a vendor site, and it is the only one that produces content worth reading — a guide written to make one product look inevitable is recognisable within a paragraph, and nobody trusts it.
So the comparisons say when the cheaper option is correct. The hardware guidance says that we sell no hardware and take no margin on it. The glossary links to feature pages rather than pretending a definition is a sales opportunity. Where a limitation is real — CAN coverage varying by vehicle, NB-IoT struggling with movement, driver scoring failing without identification — it is stated rather than omitted.
There is no plan to publish a hundred short definition pages, or city pages, or the same comparison rewritten six ways. The playbooks this site is built against warn against all of it, and they are right: volume without information gain is how a site becomes indistinguishable from every other site in the market.
A question these do not answer is the most useful thing you can send us. Ask it or message us on WhatsApp — the next guide usually comes from one.
For buyers, which is the only way the second one works. Each comparison opens with a short answer, carries a real table, and says when the cheaper option is the right one — including when that costs us the sale.
Because they would be thin, near-identical to what every competitor publishes, and they would compete with our own feature pages for the same intent. Definitions live in one glossary and link onward to the pages with real depth.
When something changes that affects the advice — a network retirement schedule, a protocol, a hardware generation. Each page carries a modified date, and anything time-sensitive says so rather than pretending to be permanent.
Yes. Partners and resellers are welcome to share them, and if you want a version without our branding for a proposal, ask and we will provide one.
Send us the question. If others are likely to be asking it too, it becomes the next guide.
Ask a Question →